Car modifications

Car Modifications Talks Archive

A-E | E-M | M-S | S-Z

1st page | 2nd page | 3rd page | 4th page | 5th page | 6th page | 7th page | 8th page | 9th page





Subject:
Re: New car time again - any ideas ?

From: "Bob Sherunckle" <zilspeed(at)beeteeopenworld.com>

Subject: Re: New car time again - any ideas ?

Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2006 20:56:10 +0100

Lines: 21

NNTP-Posting-Host: 81.129.27.126

_______________________________________













"Elder" <carl.robson(at)bouncing-czechs.com> wrote in message

news:MPG.1effbe739d98aebf424(at)news.individual.net...

> In article <1hh5avd.q9zwbs5r2dpxN%steve(at)italiancar.co.uk>,

> steve(at)italiancar.co.uk says...

> )

>>

>>Alfa 156 V6. YKIMS.

>>

> If he is looking at Mercs, and Beemers, why not a 166? Should get a tidy

> one for the price of that 318 shouldn`t he?

> --



Fair enough, but the depreciation that has brought it within my reach will

not know to stop after I buy it. The motor trade would love me...



A quick Autotrader search shows 2005 cars at 14 grand and 1999 cars at 2500.

Six years - 10 to 11 grand in depreciation.

That`s maybe ok, but not for me unfortunately.













Next Topic

SUBJECT: Re: New car time again - any ideas ?
GO >>>

From: steve(at)italiancar.co.uk (SteveH)

Subject: Re: New car time again - any ideas ?

Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2006 20:58:38 +0100

Lines: 20

_______________________________________











Elder <carl.robson(at)bouncing-czechs.com> wrote:



> In article <1hh5avd.q9zwbs5r2dpxN%steve(at)italiancar.co.uk>,

> steve(at)italiancar.co.uk says...

> )

> >

> >Alfa 156 V6. YKIMS.

> >

> If he is looking at Mercs, and Beemers, why not a 166? Should get a tidy

> one for the price of that 318 shouldn`t he?



Bloody good point.



He`d get a cracker for half what the 318i would cost - V6 166s are

absolutely loaded with kit, go like fuck, and cost peanuts.

--

Steve H `You`re not a real petrolhead unless you`ve owned an Alfa Romeo`

http://www.italiancar.co.uk - Honda VFR800 - MZ ETZ300 - Alfa 75 TSpark

Alfa 156 2.0 TSpark - Coming Soon ! - COSOC KOTL

BoTAFOT #87 - BoTAFOF #18 - MRO # - UKRMSBC #7 - Apostle #2 - YTC #






Next Topic

SUBJECT: Re: New car time again - any ideas ?
GO >>>

From: steve(at)italiancar.co.uk (SteveH)

Subject: Re: New car time again - any ideas ?

Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2006 20:58:41 +0100

Lines: 27

_______________________________________











Bob Sherunckle <zilspeed(at)beeteeopenworld.com> wrote:



> >

> > Alfa 156 V6. YKIMS.

> > --

>

> Much as the idea has crossed my mind (more than once), I reckon it would

> manage to both make the experience special and ruin it simultaneously.

> Fabulous engine / terrible fuel consumption / Wonderful handling / crap

> dealers. It`s a very fine balance between fantastic and terrible.



Sod the dealers - find a local specialist. They rarely go wrong so long

as you maintain them - most fucked ones are due to broken belt

tensioners, or lack of oil.



Yes, fuel consumption can look scary, but I was averaging 26-28mpg in

the Marea, ffs, and they`re not much worse than that.



> Might consider a 2.4 JTD however :-)



Very good choice. A bit of an odd one, as they hold their value *very*

well. £3.5k is the starting point for a nice early one.

--

Steve H `You`re not a real petrolhead unless you`ve owned an Alfa Romeo`

http://www.italiancar.co.uk - Honda VFR800 - MZ ETZ300 - Alfa 75 TSpark

Alfa 156 2.0 TSpark - Coming Soon ! - COSOC KOTL

BoTAFOT #87 - BoTAFOF #18 - MRO # - UKRMSBC #7 - Apostle #2 - YTC #








Last "Cars" Post on Wordpress:


Title: Apparently Canadian Superheroes Drive Porsches...
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 23:33:31 +0000
Author: dailydale

they were in Canada right? You guys live in igloos up there right?

they were in Canada right? You guys live in igloos up there right?

A couple of guys in Ottawa became vigilante heroes last Friday after chasing down a sexual assault suspect in a Porsche 997 twin turbo. Apparently the two guys (the passenger was Matt Spezza, brother of Senator’s Jason Spezza) were driving along when some hysterical girl jumped in front of the car and basically claimed that someone just tried to rape her. She pointed out the guy, who was still parked on the side of the road, waiting for the girl to calm down and get back in the car (good luck). When he realized these two had stopped to help her, he drove off in his Pontiac Wave. So the “Porsche police” told the girl, who was on the phone with 911, to get in the back of their car and the promptly starting chasing this guy down (Porsche 997 vs. Pontiac Wave), apparently reaching speeds of a buck seventy (over 100mph) throughout the streets of Ottawa. The chase ended when the Porsche police forced the guy to make the wrong move into a Mcdonalds drive thru, where the real police had set up a roadblock (it was very likely the cops were eating chicken nuggets at the time). The suspect was charged with… *deep breath* sexual assault, forcible confinement, uttering death threats, dangerous driving, impaired operation of a vehicle, and driving over the legal limit of intoxication.

The Porsche Police

The Porsche Police

So apparently the jury (aka the canadian public) are split on the Porsche police’s actions. Some say that the guys are heroes for chasing the suspect down which eventually led to his arrest, while others think they had no right to speed through the streets to get him. The cops are keeping their mouth’s shut on the situation, even leaving it out of the official press release, because the guys were on the phone with 911 at the time, and were not told to give up the chase. Sure, they could have easily just taken the guys licence plate and told the cops and let them deal with it, but where’s the fun in that? This was probably the only time in the driver’s whole life that he was legally able to tear through the streets as fast as his hot whip would allow. The police are not pressing charges against the men, but at the same time, they aren’t condoning what they did. They are attempting a bit of damage control by saying that nobody should pursue a criminal, rather alert the police then let them do their job. What do you think?